Re: RPM Revisited

Posted by MRR on December 05, 1997 at 11:36:04

In Reply to: RPM Revisited
posted by Bill Pursel on December 04, 1997 at 19:04:29

: Ahhh the wonders of modern math!!!
The uncertainty here is MPH.I have followed several of the A's in our club in my Suburban and clocked them at speeds that vary significantly from the speeds that they claim they are going.Some guys refuse to recognize that their speedometer could possibly be inaccurate.I'm with the fool in suggesting that under 50 is a good thing.We have several demons in the club that insist on traveling 47 by their clock no matter what.Given my car's tendency to "wander" at speed, it's a frightening experience to look down at 62 MPH and later hear the announcement that we were going "about 45".I'm going to try to organize a radar meet in our club to demonstrate to everybody that the A speedo can be significantly incorrect.I can only assume that this may also be of concern to you.Yea, Yea another tirade, but I feel better.

Follow Ups:
Re: RPM Revisited Marco Tahtaras December 05, 1997 at 12:42:22(1)
Re: RPM Revisited Louis Eschete December 05, 1997 at 15:19:46(0)

E-Mail Comment to Webmaster